Small Payment Institution and Small EMI License in 2026
A 2026 deep dive into the EU small PI and small EMI regimes: volume thresholds, capital, safeguarding, fast-track authorisation, upgrade path to full PI or EMI, and comparison of small-regime jurisdictions.
What a small PI or small EMI licence is for
A small Payment Institution (SPI) or small Electronic Money Institution (small EMI) is a lighter version of the full PI and EMI licences designed for domestic, sub-scale fintechs. The regime exists in every Member State that exercised the Article 32 PSD2 option, most visibly Lithuania, Ireland, Poland, France, the Czech Republic and (post-Brexit) the United Kingdom.
A small licence lets you provide the same Annex I payment services as a full PI, and for a small EMI the same e-money issuance as a full EMI, but with lower capital, lighter governance and faster authorisation. The trade-off is simple.
What you get
- Lower initial capital, sometimes none at all
- Fast-track file review in 3 to 6 months
- Lighter reporting, fewer fit-and-proper tests
- Same safeguarding protection for customer funds
What you give up
- No EU passport. You can operate only in your home state
- Volume cap: exceed it and you must upgrade or stop
- Some conduct rules (PISP/AISP) may be out of scope
- Banking and BaaS partners see you as a lower tier
The small regime is built for a specific moment in a company's life: prove the product, stay domestic, reach enough volume and margin to justify a full licence.
Let's discuss your project and see how we can launch your small PI or small EMI payment product together
Request demoThe volume thresholds that define the regime
The small PI and small EMI perimeters are set by PSD2 Article 32 and Article 9 of the E-Money Directive, and transposed with some national variation.
| Regime | EU threshold | Typical cap | What happens above |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small PI (Article 32 PSD2) | Monthly average of payment transactions does not exceed EUR 3 million over the preceding 12 months. | EUR 3M / month average volume. | Must apply for a full PI authorisation or stop growing. |
| Small EMI (Article 9 EMD2) | Average outstanding e-money does not exceed EUR 5 million, and total payment transactions do not exceed EUR 3 million per month. | EUR 5M average outstanding e-money balance. | Must apply for a full EMI authorisation. |
| UK small PI (post-Brexit) | Monthly average under EUR 3 million, FCA small-PI register. | Same EUR 3M/month. | Apply for authorised PI (API) status with the FCA. |
| UK small EMI | Average outstanding e-money under EUR 5 million and transactions under EUR 3M/month. | EUR 5M outstanding. | Apply for authorised EMI status. |
The volume calculation is based on a rolling 12-month average, not a single peak month. You must notify the regulator as soon as you can reasonably see the threshold will be exceeded in the next 30 days, and you have 30 days to file for the full licence after the breach.
Initial capital and ongoing own funds
Member States set their own numbers under the Article 32 ceiling. The norm is a material discount to the EUR 20k / 50k / 125k initial capital of a full PI and the EUR 350k of a full EMI.
Even where initial capital is zero, an ongoing own-funds test still applies. Lithuania, Ireland and Poland use a simplified version of PSD2 Methods A, B and D. UK small PIs calculate own funds as the greater of a fixed-overheads-based floor and the product of transaction volume and a percentage tied to their service mix.
A small EMI must additionally pre-fund a safeguarding float equal to the average outstanding e-money balance. This is the same safeguarding logic as a full EMI but on a much smaller balance.
What a small PI can actually do
The service perimeter of the small PI regime follows PSD2 Annex I, but Member States can exclude or restrict some activities.
- Execution of payment transactions and merchant acquiring - allowed in every jurisdiction that operates a small PI regime.
- Money remittance - allowed and common, often the core small-PI use case (MTOs, domestic family remittance).
- Issuance of payment instruments - allowed, but some regulators require a higher-tier licence for card issuing with a wallet (which they classify as e-money).
- Payment initiation (PISP) - allowed under PSD2 in principle but scoped out by several Member States because of the higher operational-risk profile.
- Account information (AISP) - handled through a separate registration rather than a small PI in most jurisdictions.
The critical restriction is territorial. A small PI cannot passport to other Member States and cannot accept cross-border customers by remote onboarding. Domestic activity only. Some regulators tolerate inbound customers from neighbouring states under freedom-of-services rules of the PSP on the other side, but active marketing abroad triggers full-PI rules.
The fast-track authorisation process
The small regime exists precisely to shorten time-to-market. Expect a lighter file and faster decision than a full PI or EMI.
- Business plan and volume forecast. Show that the firm plans to stay under the EUR 3M/month cap for at least the first 24 months, with a sensible trigger for upgrade.
- Simplified governance file. Fewer fit-and-proper questionnaires. The MLRO and one compliance officer are usually enough, versus a full board package for a full PI.
- Light AML manual. Aligned with the Fifth and Sixth AML Directives but without the full institutional-risk-assessment expected from a large firm.
- Safeguarding plan. Non-negotiable. Customer funds must be safeguarded at a credit institution or under an insurance policy from day one, just like a full PI.
- Submission and decision. Statutory clocks range from 3 to 6 months depending on jurisdiction. Realistic end-to-end is 4 to 9 months.
- Registration vs authorisation. Small PIs are on a public register rather than the EBA authorised-institution list. They are regulated but not passportable.
Small EMI files are one step heavier because the regulator reviews the e-money safeguarding design, wallet architecture and redemption flow. Budget an extra 2 to 3 months compared to a small PI in the same jurisdiction.
Small vs full: when to upgrade
The right time to upgrade is not when you hit the cap but 6 to 9 months before you hit it. A full PI or EMI application takes that long in any serious jurisdiction.
| Signal | Stay small | Upgrade to full PI/EMI |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly volume trend | Steadily under EUR 2M. | Approaching EUR 2.5M in any 3-month window. |
| Customer geography | 100% domestic, no inbound interest. | Active demand from 2+ EEA markets, real passporting need. |
| Product roadmap | Single product, no card or wallet plans. | Cards, IBANs, wallets, or BaaS distribution. |
| Banking partners | Partners accept small-PI counterparty. | Tier-1 banks require authorised-PI status. |
Upgrading is not a fresh authorisation from scratch. Regulators use most of the small-PI file as the base and ask for the incremental documents (full governance, stressed business plan, own-funds methods, passporting notifications). Firms that prepared the small file with the upgrade in mind save 6 to 9 months.
Where small PIs and small EMIs actually live
Jurisdiction choice matters even inside the domestic regime. Four markets dominate.
Lithuania
Most active small-PI regime in the EU. Bank of Lithuania runs the process in English, offers a newcomer programme and a regulatory sandbox, and typically authorises a complete file in 3 to 5 months. Transition to full PI is standardised.
United Kingdom
FCA small-PI and small-EMI registers have the deepest population of firms globally. The process is in English, pragmatic, and the small-EMI regime is particularly useful for early neobanks before they hit the EUR 5M balance threshold.
Ireland
CBI operates a small PI regime with tight substance expectations. Useful for firms that want an Irish base but cannot yet afford a full CBI authorisation, which runs to 12 to 24 months.
Poland
KNF's Small Payment Institution (MIP) regime is fast-growing, with hundreds of registrations. Domestic-only but with flexible service scope. Good entry point for Polish-market-only products.
France (AEMI and AEP), Czech Republic and a handful of CEE states also run small regimes but with lower uptake because firms tend to skip straight to full PI or EMI.
Safeguarding and AML: no discount here
The small regime discounts capital and reporting, never customer protection or AML. The rules are identical to full PI and EMI.
- Safeguarding. Customer funds segregated at a credit institution or under an insurance or guarantee arrangement, reconciled daily, never comingled with firm funds.
- AML programme. Full KYC, sanctions screening, PEP review, ongoing monitoring, SAR filing and recordkeeping. The MLRO is personally responsible regardless of firm size.
- Incident reporting. Major operational and security incidents must be reported to the regulator within 4 hours of detection, same as a full PI under EBA guidelines.
- DORA alignment. Small firms have a proportionality regime under DORA but must still document ICT risk, business continuity and outsourcing.
Regulators increasingly flag "small" as a risk factor rather than a relief. Expect focused supervisory visits on safeguarding reconciliation and AML transaction monitoring in the first 12 months after authorisation.
From small to full: the upgrade playbook
Upgrading is a project, not a form fill. Use the approach that most successful teams have adopted.
- Plan the full-PI file from day one. Write governance, AML and safeguarding documents at full-PI standard even when you apply as small. Most of the uplift is in the level of detail, not the policy itself.
- Build volumes evenly. A lumpy monthly pattern makes the 12-month average hard to manage. Regulators read erratic growth as operational risk.
- Pre-fund capital for the full regime. Raise the EUR 125k (or EUR 350k for EMI) before filing so the only change at upgrade is paid-up capital evidence.
- Hire for full-PI governance early. Head of risk, head of compliance, independent non-executive directors. Regulators remember interim structures and ask tough questions at upgrade.
- Automate safeguarding and reporting. Manual reconciliation does not scale past EUR 2M/month without errors. A fintech that arrives at the upgrade with a solid ops stack gets approved noticeably faster.
The upgrade window is also a natural moment to consider EU-wide strategy: stay small and domestic, or upgrade and passport across the EEA.
Ship a small-PI or small-EMI product with Crassula
The small regime is the right door for founders who want to prove a payment product without burning two years on a full-PI file. Crassula is the operational core that gets you from idea to live product inside the 4 to 9 month licensing window, and then follows you into the full-PI or full-EMI upgrade without a replatforming project.
Ledger and accounts
Double-entry ledger, IBANs via BaaS partners, multi-currency accounts, card issuing ready when you need it.
Small-regime AML
KYC, sanctions, monitoring and case management sized for small firms but upgrade-ready for full PI.
Daily reconciliation
Automated safeguarding account reconciliation, evidence pack your supervisor expects.
Upgrade-ready
Same platform through small to full PI/EMI. No re-platforming at the upgrade moment.
We work alongside your legal counsel to scope the file, plug the technology into your home regulator's expectations, and prepare the upgrade path the day your volumes approach the threshold.
FAQ
A small Payment Institution is a lighter version of a full PI authorisation granted under PSD2 Article 32, available to firms whose monthly average payment volume stays below EUR 3 million. Lower capital, lighter reporting, domestic only, no EU passport.
The average outstanding electronic money must not exceed EUR 5 million, and total monthly payment volume must stay below EUR 3 million on a 12-month rolling average. Exceed either and the firm must apply for a full EMI.
No. The small regime is domestic only. Serving customers in other EU Member States requires a full PI authorisation and a passporting notification through the home regulator.
Statutory clocks range from 3 to 6 months. Realistic end-to-end timelines are 4 to 9 months in Lithuania, the UK and Poland, and 6 to 12 months in Ireland or France for a complete file.
PISP is restricted or scoped out by several Member States. AISP is usually handled through a separate registration rather than under the small PI regime. Check the national rule of the home state.
Six to nine months before the volume breach, because a full PI or EMI application takes that long. Do not wait for the cap to bite; a forced upgrade under time pressure is the single most common cause of service interruption.
No. Customer funds must be safeguarded at a credit institution or under an insurance or guarantee arrangement, segregated from firm funds, reconciled daily. The rules are identical to a full PI or EMI.
Crassula provides the white-label core that scales from small to full: ledger, IBANs, wallets, card issuing, KYC and AML, safeguarding reconciliation and regulatory reports. The same platform supports the upgrade to a full PI or EMI without a re-platforming project.